General Chat

I'm back

twitter.com/OERMLuk

Please contact me if you can help with basic web page/YouTube edits - simple if you know how!

Someone kindly offered their services a few months ago - but I can't remember who!

Pls contact me with your phone number if you can help: info@opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk :kiss:

www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/dart...king-bizarre-4868781

Sensible man

twitter.com/retailer_audit?refsrc=email&s=11

dg-di.us/OMS/UK/678525.html

Too close to reality for many of us

Is it just my bad eyes, or was Claudia struggling to read the autocue on Striclty Come Dancing tonight?

Rumour has it she had laser eye surgery, so no surprise if she has problems!

Let's hope if she has she'll be honest enough to shout about it!
______________________
admin: See 'Claudia Winkleman' post on BBC News & Press Topic

You put here to contact number of lawyers who can help us, but when you phone up they say sorry I cant help because its over 3 years ...

I tried numerous solicitors from day one of getting corneal ectasia - nobody would take on my case. Like most of you I've got depression, attempted suicide, lost confidence, was out of work , got real aggressive & to top all that its caused my marriage to be over.

Thanks ULTRALASE! They refused my surgery at first then after several meetings decided it was ok even though they said I had thin corneas & scarring on my eye
______________________
admin: Pls contact me with your phone number info@opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk

DCM Holdings (Optical Express) made their second (unsuccessful) complaint to Nominet DRS in October ‘13: www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/07/optical...wins_nominet_battle/

Before then, OERML was targeted with approximately 200 spam posts, and at least 2,000 new users registering on the Forum every day.

These were sent by ‘spambots’, from IP addresses in China, Russia, the US, and other locations.

Someone was paying for these grubby companies to disrupt OERML, but they wasted their money as I simply deleted the unapproved posts and withdrew open registration.

In their second (unsuccessful) complaint to Nominet DRS, Optical Express lied that I had posted links to OERML on thousands of random sites, including weird Chinese pornographic sites - that I couldn’t have found if I’d tried!

OE sent Nominet a list of the links, claiming - if I remember correctly, that I’d posted on 10,000 within 3 weeks.

"If only I had the time", I responded!

All DRS communications and documents are filed online, available to claimant and defendant, so OE saw my response within a short time of my submitting it to Nominet.

I suggested that a correlation might be found between the IPs of the pornographic websites and the spam I was receiving.

Suddenly the spam stopped.

But I think I must have upset someone yesterday, because the spambot attack has resumed!

At least 50 posts yesterday, from different IP addresses registered to the same company in Ukraine.



This morning I have deleted 11 new spam posts, and with that start to the day I expect at least a 100 more!

Whoever is paying sleazy 'PE Tetyana Mysyk' to attack OERML is wasting their money, because the posts never get to see the light of day - other than the example I'm posting here!

Perhaps David Moulsdale didn’t like the stocking filler he received yesterday morning, a legal letter from my very lovely lawyer, a libel and media litigation specialist.

This was followed by another little surprise, which I don't think went down too well either - but you’ll have to wait a few days to hear about that

I found these quotes from a US Ophthalmologist. Says it all really.

"If eyeglasses were just invented, they would be considered a major boon to mankind. The benefit of glasses could be truly touted as great and with NO ocular complications. Removing eyeglasses simply returns the patient to their pre-eyeglass visual condition. This is not the case with refractive surgery. Surgery is not reversible. It is plastic surgery (tissue is removed to create a differently-shaped structure). Refractive surgery was not invented as a way to relieve the "scourge" of nearsightedness and to benefit all of mankind but as a means to make money. If it was foolproof, VSRN would not exist.

In the years that I have been consulting, the significant majority of patients with refractive surgery complications visiting VSRN were considered "good" candidates, meaning that there were no perceived visual or physical contraindications to having surgery. Does this mean the surgeon erred? In some cases. But, in my opinion, the number one reason patients end up with less than satisfactory results is because of the inherent shortcomings of refractive surgery procedures. It is, after all, plastic surgery on an amazingly precise piece of clear tissue - the cornea - that is constructed in a highly specific fashion, a tissue that is not the root cause of nearsightedness or farsightedness and yet is sacrificed to correct refractive errors elsewhere in the eye."
visionsurgeryrehab.evecommunity.com/eve/...494/m/8697006316/p/1

After several letters/emails back and forth with Stephen Hannan i'm afraid I have come to the conclusion that he is a serial LIAR!!

This Company is really not to be trusted with anything, let alone your precious eyes

They started by telling me (as they do all other damaged patients) that I have great eyesight, and when that didn't work they switched to telling me that i was advised of the risks.

If you read the emails between Stephen Hannan and myself (I will publish them in due course) it seems like just about everyone at Optical Express warned me of the dangers including the alternative (that would be glasses) except they didn't.

I was also told a man i had never met advised me in Harley St, who then became a woman and called 'he'!! I hope you can follow this, difficult I know.

I was told that i was given an informed consent form on my first visit to an optom - I was not it was actually a quote for the cost, and that he ran through all possible outcomes. Such lies.

The man (who is totally made up and doesn't exist) that I visited in Harley St apparently sat with me for a very long time warning me of the risks, including

1. Explained Refractive Lens Exchange procedure and statistics
2. Discussed possible risks and complications – halos, glare, risk of infection after treatment.
3. Problems after surgery could result in IOL being taken out.
4. Advised px a follow up treat may be necessary – LASIK or PRK if result not satisfactory
5. Advised px will need reading glasses after treatment even if multifocal IOL used for small print.
6. chance of requiring glasses for small print 5%, computer 2%
7. Gave px details of research websites to explore
8. Px have read informed consent and patient information booklet and understands everything.
9. All questions answered.

Except he did not as i never met him!!

I wonder which website i was told to research (point 7) because i definitely was NOT?

Opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk would have been a good start!!

If Optical Express spent this much time advising patients of the risks you would never have time to discuss your operation with a surgeon. Oh I forgot - you DON'T!

I will say again for the record, i was told by a world renowned eye surgeon that he would not have performed this operation on me, however Stephen Hannan states that one of the optoms identified me as an excellent candidate for Natural Lens Replacement (RLE).

To Stephen Hannan, you are a LIAR of the worst kind, telling me what was discussed in conversations that took place when I was there and you were not. It is a disgrace that you are in any way involved in the so called care of people's eyes.