logo6

Optical Express Complaint to NOMINET DRS

  • Nick
  • Nick's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Thank you received: 0

Replied by Nick on topic The Register.co.uk

Posted 10 Apr 2014 19:32 #1
I am sure I am not the only one who went trawling the internet for advice and reassurance AFTER things had gone wrong, then discovered Sasha Rodoy. I am glad I did, otherwise I might have let the clowns at OE operate on me for a second time to correct their original mistake.

While I should have researched more thoroughly prior to surgery, I sincerely hope all this recent press will educate those contemplating refractive eye surgery and make them think twice.

30% problems is way too high a risk for one of your most precious senses.
Last Edit:10 Apr 2014 21:46 by Nick

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Thank you received: 153

Replied by admin on topic The Register.co.uk

Posted 07 Apr 2014 14:17 #2
by admin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Thank you received: 153

Replied by admin on topic Press interest at last!

Posted 05 Apr 2014 23:14 #3
www.theguardian.com/society/2014/apr/05/...uined-my-life-ruling
"Optical Express loses bid to close laser eye surgery critic's website
Biggest laser eye surgery provider claimed a bitter rival funded the Optical Express Ruined My Life website, run by Sasha Rodoy
"
:kiss:
Last Edit:07 Apr 2014 07:40 by admin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Thank you received: 153

Replied by admin on topic Nominet DRS Decision: March 2014

Posted 05 Apr 2014 12:21 #4
Last Edit:05 Apr 2014 12:23 by admin
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Thank you received: 153

Replied by admin on topic Nominet DRS Decision: January 2014

Posted 05 Apr 2014 12:18 #5
Last Edit:05 Apr 2014 12:23 by admin
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Thank you received: 153

Replied by admin on topic Nominet DRS Decision: August 2012

Posted 05 Apr 2014 11:59 #6
Last Edit:05 Apr 2014 12:22 by admin
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Thank you received: 153

Replied by admin on topic Optical Express Appeal Nominet DRS decision

Posted 08 Jan 2014 12:05 #7
Last Edit:08 Jan 2014 12:05 by admin
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Streisand Effect of failed takedown

Replied by Streisand Effect of failed takedown on topic Streisand Effect of failed takedown

Posted 07 Jan 2014 19:30 #8
I was unaware of the potential problems until I read about the failed take-down attempt as published at The Register.

www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/07/optical...wins_nominet_battle/

Yet another example of corporate bullying resulting in a Streisand Effect.

To quote WikiP:
"The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet."

One would have thought competent lawyers would, by now, be aware of it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_Effect
Last Edit:07 Jan 2014 23:44 by Streisand Effect of failed takedown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Nick
  • Nick's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Thank you received: 0

Replied by Nick on topic WE WON!!!

Posted 03 Jan 2014 03:14 #9
FUNTASTIC
by Nick

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Thank you received: 153

Replied by admin on topic WE WON!!!

Posted 02 Jan 2014 09:41 #10
NOMINET DRS Decision:

"The Expert finds that this is a resubmission of a Complaint already made, in substance, in DRS 11271, and that there are no exceptional grounds which would justify a rehearing. The Complaint is therefore rejected.

Signed Bob Elliott
Dated 1st January 2014
"

More details later!
:kiss:
Last Edit:02 Jan 2014 09:41 by admin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: adminSasha Rodoy

OERML & My Beautiful Eyes Foundation rely on your support to expose the horrors of this unregulated industry.

Your help is very much appreciated!

Amount